Tag Archives | Brokerage

The Hardcore Brokers: Core-Periphery Structure and Political Representation in Denmark’s Corporate Elite Network

Lasse Folke Henriksen, Jacob Aagard Lunding, Christoph Houman Ellersgaard, Anton Grau Larsen

Sociological Science November 18, 2025
10.15195/v12.a31


Who represents the corporate elite in democratic governance? In his seminal work on the corporate “inner circle,” Useem (1986) studied three network-related mechanisms from corporate interlocks that together shaped the ideology and political organization of American and British corporate elites during the postwar era in crucial ways: corporate brokerage, elite social cohesion, and network centrality. Subsequent research has found similar dynamics at play across a variety of democratic capitalist societies. However, all existing studies on corporate elite representation in democratic governance rest on analyses of the top ranks at very large corporations. We cast a wider net. Analyzing new population data on all members of corporate boards in the Danish economy (∼200,000 directors in ∼120,000 boards), we locate ∼1,500 directors who operate as brokers between local corporate networks and measure their network coreness using k-core detection. We find a highly connected network core of ∼275 directors, half of whom are affiliated with smaller companies or subsidiaries and then document the power of director coreness in predicting government committee attendance, a key form of political representation in Denmark’s social-corporatist model of governance. We find a large political premium for directors in very large companies but show that within the network core the gap between directors of smaller and large companies is closed, suggesting that the network core levels the playing field in corporate access to the legislative process.
Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Lasse Folke Henriksen: Department of Organization, Copenhagen Business School.
E-mail: lfh.ioa@cbs.dk
Jacob Aagard Lunding: Department of Social Sciences and Business, Roskilde University.
E-mail: jaagaard@ruc.dk
Christoph Houman Ellersgaard: Department of Organization, Copenhagen Business School.
E-mail: che.ioa@cbs.dk.
Anton Grau Larsen: Department of Social Sciences and Business, Roskilde University.
E-mail: agraul@ruc.dk

Acknowledgments: We would like to thank Leonard Seabrooke, Felix Bühlman, Donald Tomaskovic-Devey, Thomas Lyttelton, and Megan Neely for commenting on an earlier draft of this article. We also thank participants at the Political Economy Group Seminar at the Copenhagen Business School for engaging with an earlier draft. We are grateful to the Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant 5052-00143b), the Carlsberg Foundation (grant CF19-0175), and the Velux Foundation (grant 00048306) for generously supporting this research.

Supplemental Materials

Reproducibility Package: Because our data-use agreement prohibits direct sharing of our analytic data, we share only the analysis code here: https://github.com/JacobLunding/hardcore_brokers_replication. Interested parties may apply to Statistics Denmark (https://www.dst.dk/en/TilSalg/Forskningsservice/Dataadgang/) for access to the data (project 706264) and can run the full replication package from the folder named “/replication,” which includes all data generating steps of the analysis and the analytical code.

  • Citation: Henriksen, Lasse Folke, Jacob Aagard Lunding, Christoph Houman Ellersgaard, Anton Grau Larsen. 2025. “The Hardcore Brokers: Core-Periphery Structure and Political Representation in Denmark’s Corporate Elite Network” Sociological Science 12: 769-803.
  • Received: December 19, 2024
  • Accepted: September 24, 2025
  • Editors: Arnout van de Rijt, Michael Rosenfeld
  • DOI: 10.15195/v12.a31

0

When Do Haters Act? Peer Evaluation, Negative Relationships, and Brokerage

Jason Greenberg, Christopher C. Liu, Leanne ten Brinke

Sociological Science April 17, 2024
10.15195/v11.a16


In many organizational settings, individuals make evaluations in the context of affect-based negative relationships, in which an evaluator personally dislikes the evaluated individual. However, these dislikes are often held in check by norms of professionalism that preclude the use of personal preferences in objective evaluations. In this article, we draw from social network theory to suggest that only individuals that are network brokers—those who have the cognitive freedom to flout organizational norms—act to down-evaluate the peers they dislike. We evaluate our theory using two complementary studies: one field site study and an experiment. Our results, consistent across two different methodologies, suggest that overlooking an evaluator’s negative relationships as well as the network positions that constrain or enable an individual’s actions may lead to distortions in ubiquitous organizational peer evaluations processes and outcomes.
Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Jason Greenberg: SC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University
E-mail: Jg2459@cornell.edu

Christopher C. Liu: Lundquist College of Business, University of Oregon
E-mail: chrisliu@uoregon.edu

Leanne ten Brinke: Department of Psychology, The University of British Columbia
E-mail: Leanne.tenbrinke@ubc.ca

Acknowledgements: We thank Anne Bowers, Gino Cattani, Sheen Levine, Andras Tilcsik, Catherine Turco, Ezra Zuckerman, and seminar participants at Harvard and NYU for useful feedback on an earlier draft. All errors and omissions are ours alone. This study was IRB approved: (a) NYU IRB HS#10-8124 and (b) Oregon IRB STUDY00001144.

Supplemental Material

Replication Package: Our experiment was preregistered at (https://aspredicted.org/YHD_W9P). A replication package has been deposited at (https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/4MOJVQ).

  • Citation: Greenberg, Jason, Christopher C. Liu, and Leanne ten Brinke. 2024. “When Do Haters Act? Peer Evaluation, Negative Relationships, and Brokerage.” Sociological Science 11: 439-466.
  • Received: October 20, 2023
  • Accepted: December 23, 2023
  • Editors: Arnout van de Rijt, Stephen Vaisey
  • DOI: 10.15195/v11.a16


0
SiteLock