Author Archive | Jesper Sorensen

PDF (3927 views)

Abstract
Author Information
Supplemental Material
Process Info

How the influx of Hispanics is reshaping the U.S. racial landscape is a paramount question in sociology. While previous research has noted the significant differences in Hispanics’ racial identifications from place to place, there are comparatively few empirical investigations explaining these contextual differences. We attempt to fill this gap by arguing that residential context sets the stage for racial boundary negotiations and that certain environments heighten the salience of inter-group boundaries. We test this argument by examining whether Hispanics who live in highly segregated areas and areas that experience greater levels of anti-Hispanic prejudice are more likely to opt out of the U.S. racial order by choosing the “other race” category in surveys. Using data from the American Community Survey and information on anti-Hispanic hate crimes from the FBI, we find support for these hypotheses. These findings widen the theoretical scope of the roles segregation and prejudice play in negotiating racial identifications, and have implications for the extent to which Hispanics may redefine the U.S. racial order.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Michael T. Light: Purdue University. Email: mlight@purdue.edu

John Iceland: Department of Sociology and Criminology, Pennsylvania State University. Email: jdi10@psu.edu

Acknowledgements: An earlier version of this paper was presented at the annual meeting for the Population Association of America in San Francisco in 2012. The authors thank Sal Oropesa for his helpful comments on an earlier draft of this paper. We also thank Andrew Raridon for his research assistance.

Citation: Michael T. Light and John Iceland. 2016. “The Social Context of Racial Boundary Negotiations: Segregation, Hate Crime, and Hispanic Racial Identification in Metropolitan America”. Sociological Science 3: 61-84.
Received: October 20, 2015.
Accepted: November 28, 2015.
Editors: Jesper Sørensen, Mario Small
DOI: 10.15195/v3.a4

How Much Scope for a Mobility Paradox? The Relationship between Social and Income Mobility in Sweden

By Jesper Sorensen on February 4, 2016 in Articles

Richard Breen, Carina Mood, Jan O. Jonsson

Sociological Science, February 4, 2016
DOI 10.15195/v3.a3

PDF (3958 views)

Abstract
Author Information
Supplemental Material
Process Info

It is often pointed out that conclusions about intergenerational (parent–child) mobility can differ depending on whether we base them on studies of class or income. We analyze empirically the degree of overlap in income and social mobility; we demonstrate mathematically the nature of their relationship; and we show, using simulations, how intergenerational income correlations relate to relative social mobility rates. Analyzing Swedish longitudinal register data on the incomes and occupations of over 300,000 parent–child pairs, we find that social mobility accounts for up to 49 percent of the observed intergenerational income correlations. This figure is somewhat greater for a fine-graded micro-class classification than a five-class schema and somewhat greater for women than men. There is a positive relationship between intergenerational social fluidity and income correlations, but it is relatively weak. Our empirical results, and our simulations verify that the overlap between income mobility and social mobility leaves ample room for the two indicators to move in different directions over time or show diverse patterns across countries. We explain the circumstances in which income and social mobility will change together or co-vary positively and the circumstances in which they will diverge.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Richard Breen: Nuffield College, Oxford University; Department of Sociology, Oxford University. Email: richard.breen@nuttfield.ox.ac.uk

Carina Mood: Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University; Institute for Futures Studies. Email: carina.mood@iffs.se

Jan O. Jonsson: Nuffield College, Oxford university; Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University. Email: janne.jonsson@nuffield.ox.ac.uk

Acknowledgements: Thanks to participants at the RC28 meeting at the University of Virginia, August 2012, and particularly Mike Hout and Matt Lawrence, for comments on an earlier draft. Mood and Jonsson acknowledge financial support from the Swedish Council for Health, Working Life, and Welfare (FAS 2009-1320; FORTE 2012-1741) and from the Swedish Foundation for Humanities and Social Sciences (RJ P12-0636:1).

Citation: Breen, Richard, Carina Mood and Jan O. Jonsson. 2015. “How Much Scope for a Mobility Paradox? The Relationship between Social and Income Mobility in Sweden.” Sociological Science 3: 39-60.
Received: March 20, 2015.
Accepted: April 16, 2015.
Editors: Jesper Sørensen, Kim Weeden
DOI: 10.15195/v3.a3

Maternal Age and Infant Mortality for White, Black, and Mexican Mothers in the United States

By Jesper Sorensen on January 25, 2016 in Articles

Philip N. Cohen

Sociological Science, January 25, 2016
DOI 10.15195/v3.a2

PDF (5271 views)

Abstract
Author Information
Supplemental Material
Process Info

This paper assesses the pattern of infant mortality by maternal age for white, black, and Mexican mothers using the 2013 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Public Use File from the Centers for Disease Control. The results are consistent with the “weathering” hypothesis, which suggests that white women benefit from delayed childbearing while for black women early childbearing is adaptive because of deteriorating health status through the childbearing years. For white women, the risk (adjusted for covariates) of infant death is U-shaped—lowest in the early thirties—while for black women the risk increases linearly with age. Mexican-origin women show a J-shape, with highest risk at the oldest ages. The results underscore the need for understanding the relationship between maternal age and infant mortality in the context of unequal health experiences across race/ethnic groups in the US.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Philip N. Cohen: University of Maryland, College Park. Email: pnc@umd.edu

Citation: Philip N. Cohen. 2016. “Maternal Age and Infant Mortality for White, Black, and Mexican Mothers in the United States”. Sociological Science 3: 32-38.
Received: November 17, 2015.
Accepted: December 31, 2015.
Editors: Jesper Sørensen, Kim Weeden
DOI: 10.15195/v3.a2

Unequal Hard Times: The Influence of the Great Recession on Gender Bias in Entrepreneurial Financing

By Jesper Sorensen on January 6, 2016 in Articles

Sarah Thébaud, Amanda J. Sharkey

Sociological Science, January 6, 2016
DOI 10.15195/v3.a1

PDF (6249 views)

Abstract
Author Information
Supplemental Material
Process Info

Prior work finds mixed evidence of gender bias in lenders’ willingness to approve loans to entrepreneurs during normal macroeconomic conditions. However, various theories predict that gender bias is more likely to manifest when there is greater uncertainty or when decision-makers’ choices are under greater scrutiny from others. Such conditions characterized the lending market in the recent economic downturn. This article draws on an analysis of panel data from the Kauffman Firm Survey to investigate how the Great Recession affected the gender gap in entrepreneurial access to financing, net of individual and firm-level characteristics. Consistent with predictions, we find that women-led firms were significantly more likely than men-led firms to encounter difficulty in acquiring funding when small-business lending contracted in 2009 and 2010. We assess the consistency of our results with two different theories of bias or discrimination. Our findings shed light on mechanisms that may contribute to disadvantages for women entrepreneurs and, more broadly, highlight how the effects of ascribed status characteristics (e.g., gender) on economic decision-making may vary systematically with macroeconomic conditions.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Sarah Thébaud: Department of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara. Email: sthebaud@soc.ucsb.edu.

Amanda J. Sharkey: Booth School of Business, University of Chicago. Email: sharkey@chicagobooth.edu.

Acknowledgments: This research was supported by a National Science Foundation Fellowship and the Center for the Study of Social Organization at Princeton University. We thank Paul DiMaggio, Heather Haveman, Michael Jensen, Johan Chu, Elizabeth Pontikes, Chris Yenkey, seminar participants at Cornell, the Kauffman Foundation, Princeton, and the University of Michigan, and Deputy Editor Olav Sorenson for helpful comments and feedback.

Citation: Thébaud, Sarah and Amanda J. Sharkey. 2016. “Unequal Hard Times: The Influence of the Great Recession on Gender Bias in Entrepreneurial Financing.” Sociological Science 3: 1-31.
Received: June 12, 2015.
Accepted: August 21, 2015.
Editors: Olav Sorenson
DOI: 10.15195/v3.a1

A Comparative Analysis of Corporate and Independent Foundations

By Jesper Sorensen on December 15, 2015 in Articles

Justin Koushyar, Wesley Longhofer, Peter W. Roberts

Sociological Science, December 15, 2015
DOI 10.15195/v2.a28

PDF (3811 views)

Abstract
Author Information
Supplemental Material
Process Info

Notwithstanding some visible debates, systematic evidence about the implications of greater corporate involvement in the social sector is sparse. We provide some of this evidence by examining one channel of corporate influence within the nonprofit sector–company sponsorship of philanthropic foundations. Our analysis shows that corporate foundations raise more funds and distribute grants with lower overhead than similar independent (i.e., non-corporate) foundations. However, their grantmaking is also more dispersed and less relational, and they tend to be governed by more ephemeral groups of officers and trustees. These findings suggest that corporate foundations benefit from having access to the resources of the companies that sponsor them but are constrained by their additional market-based motivations. The findings also update and refine what nonprofits might expect from corporate foundations relative to their more traditional independent counterparts.

Justin Koushyar: Goizueta Business School, Emory University Email: justin.koushyar@emory.edu

Wesley Longhofer: Goizueta Business School, Emory University Email: wesley.longhofer@emory.edu

Peter W. Roberts: Goizueta Business School, Emory University Email: peter.roberts@emory.edu

Acknowledgements: The authors thank Joe Galaskiewicz, Giacomo Negro, faculty at Georgia State University, and participants at the 2012 EGOS Colloquium, the 2013 Society for the Study of Social Problems Annual Meeting, the 2013 American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, the 2014 Alliance for Research on Corporate Sustainability Research Conference, and the 2014 Academy of Management Annual Meeting for their insightful feedback and suggestions.

Citation: Koushyar, Justin, Wesley Longhofer and Peter W. Roberts. 2015. “A Comparative Analysis of Corporate and Independent Foundations.” Sociological Science 2: 582-596.
Received: December 15, 2015.
Accepted: February 19, 2015.
Editors: Jesper Sørensen, Sarah Soule
DOI: 10.15195/v2.a28

The Hidden Costs of War: Exposure to Armed Conflict and Birth Outcomes

By Jesper Sorensen on December 7, 2015 in Articles

Florencia Torche, Uri Shwed

Sociological Science, December 7, 2015
DOI 10.15195/v2.a27

PDF (4443 views)

Abstract
Author Information
Supplemental Material
Process Info

Research suggests that prenatal exposure to environmental stressors has negative effects after birth. However, capturing causal effects is difficult because exposed women may be selected on unobserved factors. We use the 2006 Israel–Hezbollah war as a natural experiment and a siblings fixed-effects methodology to address unobserved selectivity by comparing exposed and unexposed births of the same mother. Findings indicate that exposure to war in early and mid-pregnancy lowers birth weight and increases the probability of low birth weight. The effect is not driven by geographic sorting, migration, or increased miscarriages. Given that birth weight predicts health, developmental, and socioeconomic outcomes, prenatal exposure to acute stress may have long-term effects over the life course.

Florenia Torche: Department of Sociology, New York University Email: florencia.torche@nyu.edu

Uri Shwed: Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Ben Gurion University of Negev Email: shwed@bgu.ac.il

Acknowledgements: The authors thank Dvorit Angel of the Israeli Central Bureau of Statistics for preparing the data sets used in this study and Uri Goldstein for excellent research assistantship. We are also grateful to Yinon Cohen and Seymour Spilerman for helpful comments and suggestions.

Citation: Torche, Florencia, and Uri Shwed. 2015. “The Hidden Costs of War: Exposure to Armed Conflict and Birth Outcomes.” Sociological Science 2: 558-581.
Received: April 15, 2015.
Accepted: May 21, 2015.
Editors: Jesper Sørensen, Olav Sorenson
DOI: 10.15195/v2.a27

Intermediate Levels of Network Fluidity Amplify Economic Growth and Mitigate Economic Inequality in Experimental Social Networks

By Jesper Sorensen on November 30, 2015 in Articles

Akihiro Nishi, Hirokazu Shirado, Nicholas A. Christakis

Sociological Science, November 30, 2015
DOI 10.15195/v2.a26

PDF (3159 views)

Abstract
Author Information
Process Info

Social connections are mutable. Prior experimental work has shown that circumstances fostering an intermediate rate of forming and breaking social ties (“network fluidity”) facilitate the maintenance of optimal levels of cooperation in experimental social networks. Previous observational work has also suggested a relationship between economic outcomes and network structure (measured statically) at a geographic level. However, it is not known how network fluidity might affect economic growth and inequality, particularly in an experimental setting. Using data from a series of online experiments involving a public goods game in 90 independent, dynamic social networks (with N=1,529 subjects), we show that increasing network fluidity simultaneously achieves the highest level of economic growth and the lowest level of economic inequality, up to a point. These effects of network fluidity on economic outcomes are mediated, in these experiments, by the levels of cooperation and tie formation that subjects evince. Finally, we show that wealthier networks are less unequal. Social network fluidity may play an important role in economic outcomes and hence in social welfare.

Akihiro Nishi: Yale Institute for Network Science and Department of Sociology, Yale University. E-mail: akihiro.nishi@yale.edu.

Hirokazu Shirado: Yale Institute for Network Science and Department of Sociology, Yale University. E-mail: hirokazu.shirado@yale.edu.

Nicholas A. Christakis: Yale Institute for Network Science, Department of Sociology, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Department of Medicine, Yale University. E-mail: nicholas.christakis@yale.edu.

Acknowledgements: Akihiro Nishi was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) for his research at Yale University. This work was supported by grant P01-AG031093 from the National Institute on Aging and by a Pioneer Award from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Citation: Nishi, Akihiro, Hirokazu Shirado, and Nicholas A. Christakis. 2015. “Intermediate Levels of Network Fluidity Amplify Economic Growth and Mitigate Economic Inequality in Experimental Social Networks.” Sociological Science 2: 544-557.
Received: September 11, 2015.
Accepted: November 30, 2015.
Editors: Jesper Sørensen, Delia Vakdassarri
DOI: 10.15195/v2.a26

Is There a Caring Class? Intergenerational Transmission of Care Work

By Jesper Sorensen on September 30, 2015 in Articles

Maria Charles, Corrie Ellis, Paula England

Sociological Science, September 30, 2015
DOI 10.15195/v2.a25

PDF (3901 views)

Abstract
Author Information
Supplemental Material
Process Info

Most research on intergenerational social reproduction has been concerned with upward and downward movements across rank-ordered, “big-class” categories or along continuous gradients of status, income, or skill. An exception is the more nominal conceptualization of the social structure offered in recent research that focuses on qualitative differences in life conditions across occupational “micro classes.” The present analysis broadens this nominal approach by considering social reproduction across an important qualitative dimension that bridges multiple occupations: whether or not one’s work centrally involves care. Based on data from the U.S. General Social Surveys, results provide little evidence that care work is transmitted from parents to children. While women and men whose parents worked in care are more likely to do so themselves, this association is attributable to a general tendency for people to work in the same detailed occupation as their parents. Parents pass along their vertical status positions, and sometimes their specific occupations, but not care work as such. Parent–child similarity in caring outcomes likely reflects transmission of values, skills, knowledge, and network ties that are specific to detailed occupations, rather than attributable to care work broadly defined.

Maria Charles: Department of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara Email: mcharles@soc.ucsb.edu

Corrie Ellis: Department of Sociology, University of California, Santa Barbara Email: corrieellis@umail.ucsb.edu

Paula England: Department of Sociology, New York University Email: pe22@nyu.edu

Acknowledgements: Equal authors, listed alphabetically. This research was funded by a grant to England and Charles from the Russell Sage Foundation (RSF Project #85-12-05). We thank Alicia Cast, Erin Cech, Bridget Harr, Alexandra Hendley, Sarah Thebaud, and Catherine Weinberger for comments and suggestions, and Guadalupe Soto for research assistance.

Citation: Charles, Maria, Corrie Ellis, and Paula England. 2015.“Is There a Caring Class? Intergenerational Transmission of Care Work.” Sociological Science 2: 527-543.
Received: July 13, 2015.
Accepted: July 17, 2015.
Editors: Jesper Sørensen, Kim Weeden
DOI: 10.15195/v2.a25

A New Conservative Cold Front? Democrat and Republican Responsiveness to the Passage of the Affordable Care Act

By Jesper Sorensen on September 16, 2015 in Articles

Stephen L. Morgan, Minhyoung Kang

Sociological Science, September 16, 2015
DOI 10.15195/v2.a24

PDF (3640 views)

Abstract
Author Information
Supplemental Material
Process Info

Through an analysis of the 2004 through 2014 General Social Survey (GSS), this article demonstrates that the 2010 passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) decreased support for spending on health among Democrats, Independents, and Republicans, contrary to the conjecture that a rigid partisanship equilibrium has taken hold among voters in the United States. Instead, only a partisan deflection is present, with spending preferences declining more for Republicans than for Democrats, and with Independents in between. Through supplemental analysis of the GSS panel data, as well as comparative analysis of other GSS items on national spending preferences, government responsibility, and confidence in leaders, this article also undermines support for an alternative explanation that cannot be entirely eliminated from plausibility, which is that the identified period effect that emerged in 2010 and persisted through 2014 is a response to the Great Recession and resulting deficit spending by the federal government. Implications for public opinion research are discussed, lending support to current models of thermostat effects and policy-specific political mood from the political science literature, which are informed by an older literature on weather fronts in public opinion that originated in the sociology literature.

Stephen L. Morgan: Department of Sociology, Johns Hopkins University Email: stephen.morgan@jhu.edu

Minhyoung Kang: Department of Sociology, Johns Hopkins University Email: mkang25@jhu.edu

Acknowledgements: A prior version of this paper was presented at Princeton University in March 2015, and comments from seminar participants are gratefully acknowledged. We thank Peter Enns and Michael Hout for comments on the first complete draft in May 2015, and we thank the reviewer and editorial staff for their suggestions in response to our original submission in June 2015.

Citation: Morgan, Stephen L., and Minhyoung Kang. 2015. “A New Conservative Cold Front? Democrat and Republican Responsiveness to the Passage of the Affordable Care Act.” Sociological Science 2: 502-526.
Received: June 11, 2015.
Accepted: July 25, 2015.
Editors: Jesper Sørensen, Delia Baldassarri
DOI: 10.15195/v2.a24

Revisiting the Data from the New Family Structure Study: Taking Family Instability into Account

By Jesper Sorensen on September 2, 2015 in Articles

Michael J. Rosenfeld

Sociological Science, September 2, 2015
DOI 10.15195/v2.a23

PDF (9372 views)

Abstract
Author Information
Supplemental Material
Process Info

This analysis revisits recent controversial findings about children of gay and lesbian parents, and shows that family instability explains most of the negative outcomes that had been attributed to gay and lesbian parents. Family transitions associated with parental loss of custody were more common than breakups of same-sex couples among family transitions experienced by subjects who ever lived with same-sex couples. The analyses also show that most associations between growing up with a single mother and later negative outcomes are mediated by childhood family transitions. I show that many different types of childhood family transitions (including parental breakup and the arrival of a parent’s new partner) are similarly associated with later negative outcomes.

Michael J. Rosenfeld: Department of Sociology, Stanford University. Email: mrosenfe@Stanford.edu