Ethnopolitical Exclusion and Resource Conflict

Wali Reheman

Sociological Science September 14, 2026
10.15195/v13.a42


Why do natural resources fuel ethnic conflict in some ethnic homelands but not others? This article argues that the answer turns on the boundary between active discrimination and passive powerlessness. Among excluded groups, lootable resources raise conflict risk only where the state actively discriminates, not where groups are merely powerless; among included groups, the same resources predict lower risk. No rival account reproduces this positive/null/negative gradient. The boundary governs whether these groups fight, not what they fight over: petroleum pushes discriminated and powerless groups alike toward territorial conflict, wherever the oil sits. Two-way fixed-effects estimates on 859 ethnic groups in 150 countries (1960–2020) establish both patterns. The conflict-generating mechanism thus lies between a group and its state, so country-level resource-curse measures, averaged across the nation, can miss the within-country boundary that actually divides conflict from peace.

Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Wali Reheman: Department of Government, American University.
E-mail: rw8143a@american.edu.

Conflict of Interest: I declare no conflicts of interest and received no external funding for this research.


Reproducibility Package: All data, code, and documentation necessary to reproduce every empirical result in this article are openly available at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/S28Y4

  • Citation: Reheman, Wali. 2026. “Ethnopolitical Exclusion and Resource Conflict” Sociological Science 13: 1107-1131.
  • Received: May 13, 2026
  • Accepted: July 29, 2026
  • Editors: Arnout van de Rijt, Peter Bearman
  • DOI: 10.15195/v13.a42


, , , ,

No reactions yet.

Write a Reaction


The reCAPTCHA verification period has expired. Please reload the page.

SiteLock